In this talk, I reflect on the theory of anekāntavāda (non-one-sidedness) with a particular focus on its praxis. First, through textual exegesis and philosophical analysis, I highlight some of the gaps that exist between the texts and the contemporary understanding of anekāntavāda. This includes some reflections on what makes a perspective true, and more importantly, what makes it false. I then make an argument that anekāntavāda is a concept and not a precept. I do not wish to claim that one cannot derive precepts from a concept. In the rest of the talk, I explain what this argument entails and then elaborate on ways in which anekāntavāda can act as a guiding principle in different contexts. This also includes drawing attention to the theory of perspectives (nayavāda), especially the two-truths theory (niścaya-vyavahāra nayas) in the Jaina context and reflect on how nayas play a role in what many seekers are interested in: "day-to-day life". I conclude by drawing attention to a quality that a true anekāntavādin must possess and which has been alluded to by Jain philosophers across centuries—be(com)ing a 'connoisseur of perspectives' (naya-viśārada).